Freedom Philosophy Blog

Down with compulsion!

By October 4, 2021 October 23rd, 2021 No Comments

Legitimate reasons to reject vaccination mandates. Also there really is no pandemic!

Those who are skeptical or hesitant are often ridiculed and coerced into compliance. However, calling people names and mocking them with ad-hominem attacks does little to address legitimate concerns. Here are a number of reasons I believe reasonably justify a decision against these covid jabs.

Reason 1: Death rate is very low!

Unvaccinated death rate 0.016% or 1.25% out of 321 confirmed cases:

It was shown in a comparison(a) in Minnesota of 25,869 each in Moderna, Pfizer and Unvaccinated, which showed a very small negative outcome for the unvaccinated cohort, with only 0.328% requiring in hospital care, 0.068% admission to intensive care units and 0.016% resulting in death, being 4 (1.25%) out of only 321 confirmed cases in unvaccinated (1.285%).

Unvaccinated death rate 0.03% (<50) or 0.17% of 151,054 confirmed cases:

In England(b), between 1 February and 2 August 2021 a total of 48 out of 147,612 (0.03%) of unvaccinated inviduals younger than 50 died as a result of Covid-19, with an average death rate of 0.17% and hospitalisation rate of 1.96% out of 151,054 unvaccinated people with confirmed Delta variant of Covid-19

With latest research WHO shows fatality rate only 0.15%!:

The latest research as at (Feb 2021) confirms that the death toll is extremely low: merely a global infection fatality rate of approximately 0.15%(ag) and so no worse than a bad flu season(ae).

Can we therefore really call it a pandemic? Is all the alarmist hype, the scaremongering and economic and social vandalism warranted? No, I don’t think so!

Despite all the rhetoric about the Indian (Delta) variant in the media, it is far less deadly than earlier dominant variants, although it may be somewhat more transmissible:

One to the more interesting elements of the above NHS (UK) data (reformatted to provide the above simplified table) is that the total cases recorded are likely to exclude a great many (80% or more) a-symptomatic (those who have natural immunity and never develop symptoms). Not just because it is unclear if these reports follow the strict definition of the term ‘case’ to mean “instance of disease” or “a symptomatic person diagnosed with the disease”) (ie showing symptoms), but also because those without symptoms would be far less likely to get tested unless specifically asked to. This would mean the fatality rate would be even much lower.

Even though, just on these numbers as given, on average only 1.7% require hospital care and a fatality rate of only 0.2% (and only 0.02% for those below 50 years of age!). In other words, you have a 99.8% chance of recovering from Delta or 99.98% if you are under 50. Very low numbers. indeed.

Covid19 infections are very treatable prior to hospitalisation! In August 2020 interview(ac), Australian Prof Thomas Borody explains the use of Triple-therapies, such as ivermectin based with doxycycline and zinc, which are very effective in curing the disease. Even Homeopathy has proven effective treatment options(au). Not to mention other nutrients!(aw)

We know that severe negative outcomes predominantly impact older individuals and those with compromised health (such as diabetes, obesity, or other comorbidities). In the US 94% of those reported to have died from Covid19 had other on average 2.9 other issues contributing to death (including suicide, car accidents, falls, heart attacks etc..), according to the CDC.(ae)

It is very clear that the very young are not affected, in fact milder than with influenza(ax), and so makes no sense to vaccinate. Ofcourse covid impact cannot simply be split on the 50 year age line: The CDC reports(am) that compared with 18- to 29-year-olds, the rate of death is 220 times higher in 75-84 year olds and 570 times higher in those who are 85 years and older.

It is also undeniable that the average rate of death for Covid19 consistently lies above the average life expectancy!(af)

Reason 2: Vaccination can have serious consequences!

Both the US VAERS system or the UK equivalent, show total reported deaths and serious damage resulting post Covid19 vaccination is more than ALL other vaccines combined!

Please watch this not to be missed presentation at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons by Dr. Peter McCullough, MD – https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html

In the US(d) until 8 June 2021, 51,331 severe events have been officially reported, including 6,419 deaths, as direct result of Covid19 ‘vaccines’. This is 0.026% of 198.5m vaccinated individuals.

The European Union(i) reports a total of vaccine related 26,041 deaths and 2,448,362 injuries after COVID-19 injections (as at 25 Sept. 2021).

The Australian TGA reports incidences of myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome and thrombocytopenia following Covid vaccination with 573 Covid Vaccine Deaths and over 65,000 events serious enough to report!(c)(be)

Have a look at this montage compilation of the vaccine damage hitting the news if you have serious doubt there are negative effects. If you already accept it, just skip this video, because it is very impactful and sad to watch.

Source: https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/02/how-to-overcome-the-pressure-to-get-a-covid-vaccine/

You may also wish to invest time into watching this detailed presentation, given it raises a lot of good questions and provides a lot of research data that should cause plenty of concern to anyone with an interest in the truth and their health!(ba)

Growing number of reports that negative side effects of vaccine is not being reported(o)

Research report from April 2021(p) with serious concern about under-reporting and number of adverse events with Covid-19, especially damage to our immune system and issues like spontaneous abortions. Researching the VAERS data Dr Rose identifies about 6% of ‘breakthrough’ cases die (ie people who succumb to Covid19 symptoms following an injection). There are other reports(q) on notable negative effect on fertility too.

Finally, there are extremely good scientifically backed(ak) reasons NOT to vaccinate the children!(ax) It is absolute insanity, now it is clear these covid-jabs are doing little or nothing to stop the ‘pandemic’ all-over the world they want to double down and blame the continuation on unvaccinated children. Madness.

Reason 3: Vaccinated individuals still get infected and spread

In the UK, NHSTT data(b) over 11 months (1 Sept 2020 -25 July 2021) shows that whilst vaccination may reduce an individuals overall risk of becoming infected, once they are infected there is limited difference in viral load or infectiousness.

A study published in Nature shows that vaccination doesn’t stop you from being a transmission risk(f), which is also confirmed by John Hopkins: “fully vaccinated person who experiences a breakthrough infection can spread the virus just as much as an unvaccinated person”(g)

And the US CDC(h):”evidence suggests that fully vaccinated people who do become infected with the Delta variant can spread the virus to others”

AGAIN verified by the research published in BMJ and from Oxford (as)(at) as recently as August 2021! Saying:

“Fully vaccinated people can carry as much delta virus as unvaccinated people, data indicate.”

I think that was worth putting in bright bold letters! Because that makes the hyperbole that unvaccinated cause the risk, that the pandemic is of the unvaccinated and that unvaccinated are to be banned due to such risk – infuriating nonsense! Any vaccine is merely a personal protection mechanism, if that AND only that!

Now, moreover – it needs to be highlighted that the ‘vaccine’ effectiveness of 95% is incredibly misleading, because it only deals with ‘relative risk’ within a specified cohort (who are NOT actually exposed to the virus either). This leads people to think that they have a 95% rate of protection, which is wrong and depends significantly on personal risk factors!

What is more appropriate and accurate according to research(ap) is an absolute risk rating, as this takes into consideration a ‘whole of population’ risk. For Pfizer (for example) this is 0.84% (and again dependent on personal risk factors).

This means that it takes over 119 fully jabbed people to prevent a single case of Covid! – Yes, really!

Still think it is that great? Now if you wish to compare the risk of having negative effects from these jabs? NHS VAERS and other systems around the world record extremely serious side effects occur and perhaps more frequent than you think at 0.026%!(aq).

Reason 4: Vaccinated who get infected may have worse outcomes than those not vaccinated

In UK(b), over 6 months (1 Feb – 2 Aug 2021) 2,960 out of 151,054 unvaccinated individuals were admitted to ECU, which is 1.96% compared to 1,355 out of 47,008 fully vaccinated individuals, being a higher rate at 2.88%. 402 deaths (or 0.86%) were recorded for fully vaccinated cases, compared with 253 deaths (or 0.17%) of unvaccinated.

Previous studies into corona-virus based vaccines saw all animal trials fail on account of death and accellerated, paradoxical, auto-immune responses, which have been known since at least 2012.(u) Dr Tenpenni, having studied thousands of peer reviewed research papers on vaccines, explains the incredible dangers of vaccines and issues with Covid19 jabs. Incidentally, this ‘vaccine’ is still considered ‘experimental’ and has never successfully passed animal trials. She also explains the problem with PCR tests.

Israel now reports 85-95% of serious hospitalisations now occur from fully vaccinated people!(ao)

The NIH also reports(al) that natural exposure to Covid provides for lasting immunity for more than 95% of those exposed of eight months or longer. While we observe waning immunity in vaccinated individuals, with third and fourth ‘booster’ shots already being rolled out in Israel.(an)

Reason 5: In spreading it is the symptoms that matter, not vaccination status!

A recent study(e) showed “asymptomatic COVID-19-positive individuals are less contagious than individuals with severe infection, precisely because in asymptomatic individuals the immune system has an excellent response, immediately attacking the virus, slowing its replication and decreasing its potency and the likelihood of infecting other people”. Meaning vaccinated or not, it is your symptoms that matter most and unvaccinated who are not symptomatic pose little risk!

In fact, a systematic review of the literature in PubMed(af) covering 34 studies, has uncovered that only the Symptomatic and those that go on to develop clear symptoms (Pre-Symptomatic) are possible sources of transmission. The A-symptomatic have found to not be a source of infection transmission! Meaning those that do not have or develop symptoms are not a risk to others.

Regarding masks, these are not effective in preventing transmission with pre-symptomatic(ag), but the risks and effectiveness of masks it not the focus of this article. (Lest only to say masks can cause serious health issues themselves if not used appropriately in the right setting as an at-source transmission prevention mechanism.)

We can reduce risk of infection by being outdoors and getting sufficient Vitamin D, because the level in serum is associated with a significantly decreased risk of COVID-19 infection(s) and vitamin D appears to be strongly associated with COVID-19 clinical severity(t). This also contra-indicates the decision to enforce involuntary house-arrest and preventing people from going outdoors.

On top of this, scientists now explain that a-symptomatic covid-19 infections cannot occur.(y) Dr. Beda M. Stadler, the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, explained in June 2020 that you are unable to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms. Ie, you must have symptoms to be able to infect others.

Prof. Steele expresses something pretty obvious from the infection rates and research, which is that more than 80% of people have some sort of natural immunity to this Corona based virus(ai). In other words, they do not get impacted and effectively get rid of it within a day or so. These are a-symptomatic! (This means obviously there is no benefit whatsover to these 80%+ getting a jab.)

In fact I would say that anyone who falls into the 99.8% who will not die from it, or at the very least the 90%+ for whom hospital care is never needed, a vaccine simply makes no sense!

In another study in August 2020, researchers isolated and tracked 455 close intimate contacts of an a-symptomatic individual. The study shows not a single infection to the close contacts, but concludes: infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak.(z)

There is, of course a different term for a-symptomatic persons: healthy and fit!^

Reason 6: The ‘Vaccines’ are NOT that effective – You are being misled!

Let us take this Pfizer trial as an example(j), which tells us the ‘vaccine’ is 95% effective. This is incredibly misleading!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image.png

It is misleading because it is merely a Relative Risk Reduction, not a true risk reduction(ap). You may wish to read my other article for follow up, if you haven’t already (ar) but to summarise:

Based on this data (Table 2), 7 days after the second dose, the vaccine group had a total of 9 cases of Covid19, of which 8 (or 89%) showed no evidence of infection (a-symptomatic or (less likely) pre-symptomatic) and the placebo group had a total of 169, of which 162 (or 95%) had no evidence of infection. This then the first hint shows you that this means that Covid 19 is extremely mild for the vast majority (eg, 95% of unvaccinated) of those who get infected. And technically, these are not ‘cases’ but positive test results.

But the true (absolute) risk reduction for symptomatic Covid is 7 (169-162) – 1 (9 -8) = 6 / 18,198 = 0.033% (needing to inject >18,000 people to prevent 6 symptomatic cases of Covid (with 18,192 getting little or no benefit) – or if we are generous and include all positive test results: 169 – 9 = 160 / 18,198 = 0.88% absolute risk reduction of getting a positive result. This means you need to jab 113 people (18,198/160) to prevent 1 positive test result and jab 3,033 (18,198/6) to prevent 1 person getting covid symptoms. Ridiculous! Do you see now?

When you put it all together the picture becomes clearer by the day.

To top it off, the latest vaccine surveillance data from the UK Government(bb) shows that the proportionally the double jabbed are more likely to get Covid than the unvaccinated! This is especially concerning for the older fully ‘vaccinated’ age groups (40+) , who are more than twice as likely to get Covid.

So there is a growing body of evidence showing that the ‘vaccine’ does more harm than good!

In Australia, the latest data from the National Interoperable Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NINDSS), published(bc) by the Dept of Health shows that as at 21 Oct 2021, Australia recorded a total of 1590 Covid deaths. While the Australian National Database for Adverse Events Notification shows 573 Covid Vaccine Deaths over the first 9 months this year between 1/1/2021 and 1/10/2021.(be) With over 65,000 events serious enough to report!

We also have a big question over the accuracy of reporting of Covid deaths, given advice in the national guidelines(bd) that a ‘Covid death’ is a ‘confirmed covid case’ and a ‘case’ having been defined as someone with a positive test result. There is sufficient anecdotal evidence about misreporting and inflation of numbers.

Only 5% of deaths attributed to Covid can be clearly and directly said to be a covid death!(bf)

The CDC itself declares “in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). …For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.”(bf) This report shows over 14 thousand to include intentional self-harm or poisoning and over 180,000 heart failures as reportedly to have died from Covid.

Reason 7: Many Pro vaccine experts warn us against it

DR. Robert Malone (inventor of mRNA technology)

“This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics,” he said. “And so, my concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don’t have access to the data, and the data haven’t been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks — and therefore … we don’t really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision.”

Virologist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warns against the dangers of mass vaccination with this type of vaccine.(ad) He said that “prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.”

see also these doctors explaining the synthetic nature of this gene-manipulating jab, with nano-technology embedded.(r) This is dangerous and experimental.

There are many true experts raising the alarm bells!

Reason 8: the vaccine is not just a vaccine, if a vaccine at all.

Many people around the world report injection site becomes magnetic, giving truth to the idea that the vaccine contains nano-tech and graphene oxide nanoparticles solutions.(n)

Immunologist and Microbiologist Prof. Edward Steele explains why the vaccine actually cannot work to create immunity! In several hour long interviews(ai) and numerous published scientific papers(aj)

Reason 9: there may be no real pandemic! as the PCR test is seriously flawed.

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level(m).

The CDC in the US in July 2021 put out an alert to labaratories de-authorisation the use of the 2019-nCov Rt-PCR test, in part because it cannot differentiate between Corona and Influenza(v).

The PCR tests are considered scientifically meaningless!(w) This is because there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 and the PCR tests, while extremely sensitive to small particles, cannot determine where these particles came from!

The same article also provides a number of examples of where proper isolation of a virus has not been able to occur. Numerous FOIs have called into question the basis for this pandemic, as no evidence so far has been uncovered that a purified virus has actually been able to be detected and proven to exist. For example: The CDC in Atlanta has confirmed in writing they do not have any real-life, isolated, purified, sample of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus and cannot provide any records about that virus, which allegedly causes COVID-19.(aa)

However, it seems there is sufficient evidence the virus does in fact exist and has been isolated (ab)(ah). The real issue then is the basis of the local decisions – being ‘case numbers’ on a local level, and combined with ascribed ‘deaths’ to those who have had a positive test.

Furthermore, the WHO has determined that results from a PCR test with a high cycle threshold (>35) is potentially 100% false positive!(x) (Australia reported using a CT over 40)

The conclusion I come to then is: 1. the virus does exists, 2. the testing regime is too sensitive creating many false positives, therefore – there is no real pandemic. Without daily press conferences, across the world, you would have noted nothing unsual.

Not to mention that there isn’t an unusually high excess death toll. With an global infection fatality rate of just 0.15% according to latest studies.(ag)

Finally 10.: It is unethical to be forced

The Nuremberg Code (1947) states (k):
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”

United Nations in the declaration of Human Rights declares(l) that “Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community,” the Human Rights declaration is worthwhile reading in full.

The Australian Constitution(m) offers some protection against forced medical procedures and other legislation recognises the need for informed consent!

There are other treatment options available for those who get sick, which reduces the risk of this virus and given the variety of safe treatment options, such as: hopeopathy(au), vitamin-D(av) and other immune boosting vitamins and minerals, like Zinc, Vitamin C, Selenium etc.(aw)(ay)(az)

See also: https://c19protocols.com/

Further details:

If you are interested in more statistical information related to vaccines, you may also read this blog article: https://www.freedomphilosophy.life/important-considerations-in-vaccine-discussion/

You may also wish to go broader afield to find sites like these: https://www.australianssayno.com/, https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/, AAPSonline.org, https://covid19criticalcare.com/, https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/ and https://freeandhealthychildren.org to name a few

“Truths perish with those who do not desire good.”

Emanuel Swedenborg
Be properly informed and do your own research! The media our our bureaucrats won’t do it for you, they just follow the talking points handed down.

References:

(a) Source: Puranik et al.,Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707

(b) Source: Public Health England (PHE), SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical Briefing 20, 6 August 2021

(c) Source: https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-19-08-2021 (accessed 21 August 2021)

(d) Source: United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
Public Health Service (PHS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC) / Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 1990 – 08/06/2021, CDC WONDER On-line Database. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html on Aug 18, 2021 7:12:09 AM

(e) Source: Vitiello A, Ferrara F, Troiano V, La Porta R. COVID-19 vaccines and decreased transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Inflammopharmacology. July 2021. doi:10.1007/s10787-021-00847-2

(f) Source: van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer A, et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2020;586(7830):578-582. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2608-y

(g) Source: new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals @ publichealth.jhu.edu. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals

(h) Source: fully-vaccinated-guidance @ www.cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html#:~:text=Fully vaccinated people should be,isolate if they test positive

(i) EudraVigilance, https://www.adrreports.eu/en/covid19_message.html summary data through September 25, 2021.
Summarised version available: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/26041-deaths-2448362-injuries-following-covid-shots-in-european-unions-database-as-slovenia-suspends-jj-shot-after-death-of-20-year-old-student/

(j) Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

(k) Source: http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ and further information available from BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75 http://bmj.com/content/vol313/issue7070/#NUREMBERG

(l) Source: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

(m) Source: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s51.html also https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/equality-capacity-and-disability-in-commonwealth-laws-dp-81/10-review-of-state-and-territory-legislation/informed-consent-to-medical-treatment/

(m) https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

(n) https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/could-magnetic-hydrogel-explain-the-covid-vax-magnet-phenomenon/ and
https://ambassadorlove.wordpress.com/2021/08/17/self-assembling-nanotech-found-in-moderna-vaccine/

(o) Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/pyrYwU5uaXq3/

(p) Source: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/study-analysis-of-vaers-shows-the-covid-shots-are-likely-cause-of-deaths-spontaneous-abortions-cardiovascular-neurological-and-immunological-adverse-events/ and https://www.bitchute.com/video/UODpC2znALf7/ – original: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontline-news/study-analysis-suggests-the-vaccines-are-likely-cause-of-reported-deaths-spontaneous-abortions-anaphylactic-reactions-cardiovascular-neurological-and-immunological-adverse-events

(q) Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DJJvTZQxMaNK/

(r) https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/doctors-around-the-world-issue-dire-warning-do-not-get-the-covid-vaccine/

(s) Source: Teshome, Amare et al. “The Impact of Vitamin D Level on COVID-19 Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Frontiers in public health vol. 9 624559. 5 Mar. 2021, doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.624559 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7973108/

(t) Source: Nimavat N, Singh S, Singh P, Singh SK, Sinha N. Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19: A case-control study at a tertiary care hospital in India. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;68:102661. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102661 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34377451/

(u) Source: https://commission.itnj.org/2020/06/05/corona-emergency-hearing-6-andrew-wakefield-director-vaxxed-the-movie-dr-sherri-tenpenny-vaccine-awareness-advocate/

(v) Source: https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

(w) Source: https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

(x) Source: https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/the-who-declares-australias-pcr-test-results-to-be-100-false-positives/

(y) Source: https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/11/11/swiss-immunologist-explains-existing-immunity-to-sars-cov-2-and-the-myth-of-asymptomatic-carriers/

(z) Source: Gao M, Yang L, Chen X, et al. A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers. Respir Med. 2020;169:106026. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106026

(aa) Source: https://www.johnccarleton.org/BLOGGER/2021/08/07/written-proof-cdc-has-no-isolated-purified-sample-of-sars-cov-2-virus-that-causes-covid-19/

(ab) Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/

(ac) Source: https://covexit.com/we-know-its-curable-its-easier-than-treating-the-flu-professor-thomas-borody/

(ad) Source: https://covexit.com/expert-sounds-the-alarm-about-risks-of-mass-vaccination/

(ae) Source: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf

(af) Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057856/ and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33898342/

(ag) Source: Ioannidis JPA. Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID-19: An overview of systematic evaluations. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(5):e13554. doi:10.1111/eci.13554 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33768536/ or https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13554

(ae) Source: https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/08/who-accidentally-confirms-covid-is-no-more-dangerous-than-flu/

(af) Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310638/

(ag) Klompas M, Baker MA, Griesbach D, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals in healthcare settings despite medical masks and eye protection [published online ahead of print, 2021 Mar 11]. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;ciab218. doi:10.1093/cid/ciab218 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33704451/

(ah) Source: Med J Aust 2020; 212 (10): 459-462. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50569 and https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/10/isolation-and-rapid-sharing-2019-novel-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-first-patient

(ai) Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwXKzL-yzt8 (interview May 2020), https://www.bitchute.com/video/bAWC4JLbxCi6/ (interview Sept 21, 2021) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ijc4mjiIquk (interview on nasal vaccine)

(aj) Source: https://independent.academia.edu/EdwardJSteele

(ak) Source: Ronald N. Kostoff, Daniela Calina, Darja Kanduc, et al., “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?”, Toxicology Reports, Volume 8, 2021, Pages 1665-1684, ISSN 2214-7500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.08.010 and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X

(al) Source: https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19

(am) Source: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-age.html

(an) Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-12/israel-preparing-for-possible-fourth-covid-vaccine-dose and https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/health/covid-vaccine-novavax.html

(ao) Source: https://teamtuckercarlson.com/news/stunning-covid-report-from-israel-the-vaccinated-account-for-95-of-severe-hospitalizations/

(ap) Source: Olliaro P, Torreele E, Vaillant M. COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness-the elephant (not) in the room. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(7):e279-e280. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00069-0 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057721/

(aq) Source: United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC) / Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 1990 – 08/06/2021, CDC WONDER On-line Database. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html on Aug 18, 2021 7:12:09 AM (Death; Life Threatening; Permanent Disability; Congenital Anomaly / Birth Defect *; Hospitalized)

(ar) Source: https://www.freedomphilosophy.life/important-considerations-in-vaccine-discussion/

(as) Source: BMJ 2021; 374 doi: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2074 (Published 19 August 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;374:n2074

(at) Source: Pouwels KB, Pritchard E, Matthews PC, et al, for the COVID-19 Infection Survey Team. Impact of delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK. https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/covid-19/covid-19-infection-survey/results/new-studies.

(au) Source: Manchanda RK, Miglani A, Gupta M, et al. Homeopathic Remedies in COVID-19: Prognostic Factor Research. Homeopathy. 2021;110(3):160-167. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1725989 and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33930904/

(av) Source: Ali N. Role of vitamin D in preventing of COVID-19 infection, progression and severity. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(10):1373-1380. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.021

(aw) Source: Shakoor H, Feehan J, Al Dhaheri AS, et al. Immune-boosting role of vitamins D, C, E, zinc, selenium and omega-3 fatty acids: Could they help against COVID-19?. Maturitas. 2021;143:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.08.003 – full text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415215/

(ax) Source: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210614/Study-suggests-COVID-19-in-children-is-milder-than-the-flu.aspx

(ay) Source: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-%E2%80%93-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf and https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/medical-evidence-and-optional-medicines/essential-documents/

(az) Source: James PT, Ali Z, Armitage AE, et al. The Role of Nutrition in COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity of Disease: A Systematic Review. J Nutr. 2021;151(7):1854-1878. doi:10.1093/jn/nxab059 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194602/

(ba) Source: https://wholehealthnow.com/video/kelia-40.html

(bb) Source: Public Health England (PHE), COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 42 , 21 October 2021

(bc) Source: https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert/coronavirus-covid-19-case-numbers-and-statistics

(bd) Source: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), CDNA National Guidelines for Public Health Units, Version 5.1, 08 October 2021

(be) Source: Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN), accessed 23 October 2021, https://apps.tga.gov.au/PROD/DAEN/daen-report.aspx

(bf) Source: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex, report accessed 23 October 2021 – Table 3


Added note: Given obesity is a major contributing factor to risk of disease, especially inflammatory disease like Covid19 – this presentation is of prime interest from a nutritional stand point.

^ There are also those who may not show symptoms with any virus, as they are generally unfit and their immune system so challenged and compromised it cannot respond and are therefore not impacted.

Cor Visser-Marchant

Cor Visser-Marchant

Spiritual life coach, author and host of Freedom Philosophy We are an online community of Christians seeking a deeper, more meaningful spirituality. Be part of something bigger!